Something that Infinity War showed me was that a massive blockbuster franchise can be interesting, and can get me excited for what’s coming next. I enjoyed The Last Jedi but it made me pretty much stop caring about what was coming next in the Star Wars universe – it made me stop caring. There seems nowhere to go in the saga, and the spin-offs are looking backwards. They are looking backwards at a character whose main attraction is their mystery, and seedy past. Han Solo is one of the great movie characters, so why ruin it by explaining it all? So it’s taken me a while to catch this, but now I have, not all of my worries came true.
One of the positives I’ve heard people say about this film is that it is fun, and I’d have to agree with that! Yet it’s not out and out silly fun, and handles the tone well. It’s fun where Rogue One sometimes wasn’t, and serious where sometimes The Last Jedi was too zany. However I’m not going to only compare it to other Star Wars movies, because actually the film felt the most separate from the main saga – for the first time! Even though it revolves around an iconic character of the franchise, the content was distant to the usual space opera affair. It really does have a criminal and dirty aesthetic, away from the melodramatic Sci-Fi stuff which at times was bleak but I liked because it was consistent right the way through. The film starts grey and ends grey.
All credit to Ron Howard for steering this ship into a more than competent directorial effort. He was cited as a safe pair of hands, but the film actually has a lot of style. The action sequences were exciting, cohesive and well put together. I was a massive fan of how mechanical the film was; with everything having a meaning and a purpose. Okay so the characters have got to get to a planet to get a thingy? There’s a special route to the planet though, and we have to fix something so that we can carry the thingy. This made the usual bore of the same plot more engaging, because it felt grounded in its problem solving. It’s quite muted visually, which allowed the flair to come from the acting performances. And I wasn’t expecting much. Alden Ehrenreich was weird casting, but honestly I thought he nailed. He’s given the odd bad line, and occasionally makes out of place decisions as Solo, however his imitation of Han is great. Emilia Clarke on the other hand is a bit of a snooze, though her fraudulent acting doesn’t crumble the entire movie. Paul Bettany is of course the best part of the film, with his villain being the perfect mix of polite and evil – he was probably more inspired as a baddie than Darth Vader to be honest.
Not sure I could ask more than what the film gave me. It’s the first modern Star Wars film that didn’t feel too long, and each set piece was a blast. The range of minor characters were good company – Lando (Donald Glover) and Beckett (Woody Harrelson) both charming. Unfortunately the film lacks any form of true empathy, and any emotion presented felt forced, with any quieter dialogue coming across as phony. I’m still waiting for another “I love you.” “I know,” moment. Despite this I’m thankful that the film didn’t bludgeon the Han Solo character, and worked as a snappy adventure film.
Is it worth the price of a cinema ticket?
I was planning on saying NO whether the film was good or not, simply because the only way to gear Disney into new characters and stories is if these back story films stop making money.